Helping Get Unstuck & Strike a Value Chord

A platform to share and reflect on my journey across the worlds of management, innovation, and social impact. Here, you'll find a collection of my management thoughts, highlights from my books, research contributions, and presentations, all rooted in years of academic and practical experience. Whether you're a student, practitioner, policymaker, or fellow thinker, this space is designed to provoke thought, encourage dialogue, and contribute meaningfully to both academic and applied conversations in business and beyond.

Subsidies and Booming Wind and Solar Power Businesses

  1. Renewable
    sources currently provide 13% of the world’s energy needs. The main
    sources of renewable energy at present are geothermal and hydro-electric
    power and biomass.

    1. Scope
      for increasing the contribution of geothermal and hydro-electric is
      limited by geology. Scope for private-sector involvement is limited
      because building dams means turfing people out of their homes, so large
      scale hydro-electric projects are undertaken only by governments.
    2. Biomass
      provides 10% of the world’s primary energy needs, mostly in developing
      countries, where villagers burn cow dung on basic stoves. There are few
      niches in developed markets: in Britain, for instance, local
      councils increasingly require new developments to get a 10-20% of their
      energy needs from renewable sources. Putting a biomass water-heater in
      the basement tends to be easier than sticking a windmill on the roof.
    3. The
      technology for producing electricity from biomass has not changed much in
      recent years, and shipping manure and woodchips over long distances is
      expensive.
  2. That
    leaves wind and solar power as the main sources of growth. According to
    the US Department of Energy, America could supply its
    entire energy needs by covering a mere 1.6% of its land area with solar
    cells.
  3. Wind
    and solar energy already play an important part in a few countries. Around
    20% of Denmark’s
    electricity comes from wind and about 80% of China’s hot water from solar
    energy. But worldwide those two energy sourced barely register. Currently,
    however, the two are enjoying their bigger boom ever. Solar photovoltaic
    power has grown by an average 41% a year over the past three years; wind
    has grown by 18% a year.
  4. During
    the wind boom of the 1970s turbine blades were around 5-10 meters long,
    and turbines produced no more than 200-300 kW of energy each. The energy
    they produced cost around $3 per kWh. Now the blades are up to 40 meters
    long and turbines produce up to 2.5 MW each at a cost of 5-8 cents per kWh
    (Note: Coal-fired electricity, depending on the plant, costs 2-4 cents per
    kWh). There are even 5MW prototypes in existence with 62 meters blades.
  5. The
    efficiency with which solar photovoltaic cells convert sunlight to
    electricity has increased from 6% when they were first developed to 15%
    now. The costs have dropped from around $20 per watt of production
    capacity in the 1970s to $2.70 in 2004 (Note: A silicon shortage has pushed
    the price up since then).
  6. There
    are three different ways in which governments have set up subsidies
    systems for the proportion of their country’s energy that should come from
    renewable sources:

    1. Germany
      and France’s feed-in tariffs give generators a fixed payment for the
      electricity they provide. This system is expensive but effective. Wind
      and solar energy has both grown fast in Germany. The guaranteed price of
      solar energy at 54-57 cents per kWh is especially generous against 8.4
      cents for wind. Germany’s feed-in tariff means that, as a generator of
      solar power you sell power to utility at 50 cents and buy at 20 cents, a
      net profit of 30 cents. The payback period for a solar panel in Germany
      is eight or nine years but the price for the electricity it generates is
      guaranteed for 20 years. Approx. 90% of output from Suntech, a leading
      company in generation of solar energy, goes to Germany thus making
      Germany the principal source of Mr. Shi’s wealth. The adverse consequence
      of this system is (i) silicon shortage which push up price of solar
      panels for use in countries that are sunnier than Germany and (ii) a big
      bill for taxpayers and electricity consumers (The feed-in system may cost
      consumers an extra 2 billion – 2.9 billion euros a year in high energy
      prices.
    2. Under
      Britain’s Renewables obligations, a set proportion of the electricity
      that power distributors buy must come from renewable sources; if they
      fail to do so they need to put money into a pot to be shared among the
      renewable providers. The system is complex and the resulting price is
      uncertain. This explains the discrepancy between planned and built
      capacity. Two adverse consequence of this system are: (i) The pot of
      money is divided between few developments, which are therefore highly profitable;
      (ii) Britain will not meet its target of producing 10% of its electricity
      from renewable by 2010.
    3. America’s
      production tax credit gives renewable-energy producers 1.9 cents per kWh,
      enough to encourage plenty of investments in wind. The system is
      unpredictable. The government has failed to renew the system in some
      years thus resulting in a slump in the business.

Source: The Economist, June 2nd 2007. (“Sunlit Uplands”
pp. 16-20)